Premier
League clubs have voted in principle for plans to introduce a spending cap
from the 2025/26 season.
The rules, should they be approved in a final vote later this year, will
replace the current Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) which have caused
controversy in the Premier League this season.
Everton and Nottingham Forest were handed points deductions this season,
which are still subject to appeal with a few weeks of the season to go, for
breaching the current rules - causing top-flight clubs to reconsider the
financial rules.
In a central London meeting on Monday, Premier League clubs discussed
proposed new rules which included a spending cap on player wages, transfer
fees and agent fees.
Sky Sports News chief reporter Kaveh Solhekol runs through the prospective
new rules and what they mean for the Premier League clubs...
What will Premier League clubs be allowed to spend from 2025/26?
The details still need to be worked on but clubs not in Europe would be
allowed to spend 85 per cent of their club revenue on squad costs. That
involves wages for their players, amortised transfer fees and also agent
fees.
The clubs that are in Europe would be allowed to spend a maximum of 70 per
cent on squad costs. That is also in line with UEFA rules.
But what a lot of people have noticed is if you can only spend a maximum of
85 per cent of your revenue on your squad and you are a rich club, then you
will always be able to spend more on your squad than the poorer clubs.
So what is the solution? There may also be 'anchoring' rules.
What is anchoring?
It's going to be something you're going to hear a lot about.
In its purest and simple form, it means all clubs would only be able to
spend a maximum of the multiple of what the bottom club earns in TV revenue.
At the moment, the bottom club gets £103.6m. If the anchoring multiple, and
this has been discussed, is going to be 4.5, then you would do £103.6m x
4.5, which results in £466m.
So £466m would be the spending cap in that instance. That is the maximum cap
on what clubs would be allowed to spend on wages, amortised transfer fees
and also agent fees.
The details are still to be ironed out, so the multiple may not necessarily
be 4.5. This is what is being worked on at the moment.
Will these new rules definitely be
approved?
These rules are in principle, so we haven't had the final vote yet.
What is happening now is Premier League executives, having had the green
light from the clubs to do some more work on these proposals, will go away
and draw up the legal rulebook, update that and then present it at the
Premier League AGM next month, when there will be a final vote.
But it looks all but certain that we will have the 'anchoring' rules and the
spending cap from the season after next because when an informal vote was
taken on Monday, only three clubs voted against the spending cap: Manchester
United, Manchester City and Aston Villa. Chelsea abstained from voting.
Why did those clubs vote against it?
This whole concept of 'anchoring' is controversial. The Premier League has
become the biggest, most exciting league in the world because clubs have
been allowed to spend a lot of money on their squads, wages, agents fees and
the infrastructure on their stadiums. Critics will say it will move in a
different direction if you restrain how much clubs can spend on their
squads.
If you tell Man City: 'you can only spend £466m on your squad', they can
come back on you and say: 'Our turnover is £800m to £900m, who are you to
tell us how much money we can spend on our squad?' If you've earned the
money, you feel you should have the right to spend the money.
As for Manchester United, there's obviously new money there and Sir Jim
Ratcliffe has bought 25 per cent of the club. They want to invest and turn
things around and they feel having a spending cap in place might mean they
have to operate with one hand tied behind their back.
There are also concerns it will affect how competitive the big clubs are in
Europe. Other countries have their own spending rules as well, but for the
Premier League to maintain its position as the most watched and most
exciting football league in the world, a lot of people would say that
Premier League clubs should be allowed to spend what their owners want to
spend as long as there isn't the threat of clubs going out of business.
How is this different from PSR?
There's a general acceptance that the current PSR rules are not fit for
purpose - that is why clubs want to change the rules.
The issue with these PSR rules is that clubs are allowed to lose a maximum
of £105m over three seasons.
We have seen clubs such as Everton and Nottingham Forest lose war with that
and that has led to a lot of trouble - the situations with points
deductions, appeals and it affects the league table. All the independent
tribunals and appeals have been a distraction and it has, I think, affected
the image and integrity of the Premier League.
That is why the Premier League clubs have got together and said: 'we need to
have new rules and we need them quickly.'
We are going to have the PSR rules for next season. These new financial
regulations would come in the season after next.
Analysis: Winners could be Brighton,
Brentford & Bournemouth
Football finance expert Kieran Maguire speaking to Sky Sports:
"It's a bit like having a credit card, just because you've got the limit to
spend a huge amount of money, it doesn't mean it's a good thing. The biggest
winners potentially would be clubs like Brentford, Brighton and Bournemouth
who have modest wage bills - they're probably paying on average £45,000 per
week.
"They could double or treble that and still be within the rules. Clubs like
that who have used the transfer market well, they could spend a lot more.
Villa and Newcastle would love it if these rules were purely adopted and no
other rules were alongside them. But I don't see an overall impact as it's
the UEFA rules that will drag the clubs back."
top